ADR requirement?

As I understand it (and I’m not a DGSA so I could well be wrong) he could carry as much of it as he wanted in his car because ADR regulations only apply to goods vehicles.

The ADR ‘awareness’ get-out, for vehicles of 3.5 tonnes and less, ends on 1st January 2007, but in the case of this particular substance that wouldn’t make any difference anyway because it’s Transport Category 4. If you’ve had ‘awareness’ training you can carry as much of it as you want without full ADR and that won’t change after 1st January. Because it’s Class 1 you’ll need to have a suitable fire extinguisher, not smoke and make sure the load is supervised at all times if the weight of the actual explosives is over 50 kg and there’s a few other things you should at least check up on.

As Jerry says, if you don’t know what you’re allowed to carry and what you’re not then it’s probably better to leave it to someone who does know. That’s certainly what I do.

Posted under Hazardous Goods - ADR

Posted by Alec at 6:00 pm, September 9, 2006

Is this HAZ-CHEM or not?

I’m not a DGSA but I don’t think 4% formaldehyde is on the Dangerous Goods list. Even if it was 25% formaldehyde it would onlly be Transport Cat 3, so you could carry 1000 litres.

Posted under Courier Basics, Hazardous Goods - ADR

Posted by Alec at 2:11 pm, February 24, 2006

Hazardous, but not really

We had a collection yesterday, 20-odd boxes from a label manafacturer. Each box had an ADR sticker on it, full details UN number Class 9 etc, all different substances. Of course all that was in the boxes were reels of the stickers but the (ADR trained) driver refused to load them until the customer covered over the stickers on the boxes.

Was he right to do so or was he just being difficult? Was the customer doing anything wrong sending out goods wrongly marked as hazardous?

Posted under Courier Basics, Hazardous Goods - ADR

Posted by Alec at 2:38 pm, February 2, 2006

Are there any courier owner-drivers who carry Radioactive parcels?

Specialist Search for ADR maybe?
In the light of the problems that could be caused if even a small amount of very low-level radioactive material was used to make a ‘dirty bomb’ you should maybe look deeper into the implications of subcontracting this type of work out.

Posted under Hazardous Goods - ADR

Posted by Alec at 5:12 pm, July 7, 2005