<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ADR training wasted on drivers &#8211; &#8216;better suited to traffic staff&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://same-day-courier.eu/alec/2008/09/23/adr-training-wasted-on-drivers-better-suited-to-traffic-staff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://same-day-courier.eu/alec/2008/09/23/adr-training-wasted-on-drivers-better-suited-to-traffic-staff/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:09:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://same-day-courier.eu/alec/2008/09/23/adr-training-wasted-on-drivers-better-suited-to-traffic-staff/#comment-9213</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://same-day-courier.eu/alec/?p=433#comment-9213</guid>
		<description>According to you then Alec anyone who hasn&#039;t received the high level of education you so obviously enjoyed should be denied the right to gainful and properly paid employment.  I don&#039;t judge my people by their acedemic skills as you seem to do, and am not prepared to write them off if they are able to carry out their duties in a fit and proper manner.  As for the traffic office staff, please remember it was you that voiced a derogatory opinion of them, and why should they sit back and take that from you.

All my drivers who handle ADR have received the proper training, along with traffic office staff,and will continue to for as long as they remain in my employ.  As far as I am aware this is still a free country and until such times that we are forced to employ only a Pseudo Aryan race that you purport to, I retain the right to form and voice my own opinion of the content of ADR training for drivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to you then Alec anyone who hasn&#8217;t received the high level of education you so obviously enjoyed should be denied the right to gainful and properly paid employment.  I don&#8217;t judge my people by their acedemic skills as you seem to do, and am not prepared to write them off if they are able to carry out their duties in a fit and proper manner.  As for the traffic office staff, please remember it was you that voiced a derogatory opinion of them, and why should they sit back and take that from you.</p>
<p>All my drivers who handle ADR have received the proper training, along with traffic office staff,and will continue to for as long as they remain in my employ.  As far as I am aware this is still a free country and until such times that we are forced to employ only a Pseudo Aryan race that you purport to, I retain the right to form and voice my own opinion of the content of ADR training for drivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://same-day-courier.eu/alec/2008/09/23/adr-training-wasted-on-drivers-better-suited-to-traffic-staff/#comment-4070</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 10:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://same-day-courier.eu/alec/?p=433#comment-4070</guid>
		<description>Your response seems to only confirm the opinion I had formed about the way you operate your company. Drivers who can’t read road signs, drivers who ignore basic requirements of ADR and traffic office staff whom you seem to imply would resort to physical violence if anyone dared to question their wisdom.

I suggest you pay more attention to the legal requirement that your drivers are competent to carry out their work in a safe manner and spend less time voicing your opinion that they actually require LESS training.

As I made clear in the original posting, I entirely agree that traffic office staff require better training in ADR, I just disagree completely that drivers need less training – and the United Nations and the DfT seem to share that opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your response seems to only confirm the opinion I had formed about the way you operate your company. Drivers who can’t read road signs, drivers who ignore basic requirements of ADR and traffic office staff whom you seem to imply would resort to physical violence if anyone dared to question their wisdom.</p>
<p>I suggest you pay more attention to the legal requirement that your drivers are competent to carry out their work in a safe manner and spend less time voicing your opinion that they actually require LESS training.</p>
<p>As I made clear in the original posting, I entirely agree that traffic office staff require better training in ADR, I just disagree completely that drivers need less training – and the United Nations and the DfT seem to share that opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://same-day-courier.eu/alec/2008/09/23/adr-training-wasted-on-drivers-better-suited-to-traffic-staff/#comment-4035</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://same-day-courier.eu/alec/?p=433#comment-4035</guid>
		<description>Having just read Alec&#039;s comments from the 23rd September, I would like to respond.

I don&#039;t know who Alec is or how long he has worked in the transport industry, and therefore cannot comment if I would consider him suitable for a position in my company or not.  But what I do have knowledge of are HGV drivers.  After 35 years I certainly know a good one from a bad one and what can and cannot be expected of them.
Some of the best drivers I have had could bearly read or write, and have one now that finds his way around by comparing the shape of the words of a destination to the road signs.  He is a very productive driver and quite happy to be working for someone who can live with and help him with his problem.

But the content of a ADR course is beyond him.  Even the ones who can pass with no problem do not have a retentive memory.  Its not usual for these men to leave a collection point with ADR product on board and yet fail to ensure they have a Trem Card.

I stand by what I say.  In the vast majority of cases the decision of what a haulier is going to carry on his truck is made by the traffic management.  Providng the product is covered by the driver&#039;s ADR license then that is not a problem.  The vehicle or trailer is often loaded in the driver&#039;s absence, and a driver turning in at 4am in the morning is highly unlikely to open up his vehicle to see what is stacked next to what.

These are all decision made by trained traffic management and therefore it is these people would really need the intensive training to ensure the load is safe both in terms of the mixing of volatile chemicals, and the packaging limits.

The driver should have concentrated training on what to do in an emergency, and how to interpret ADR labels amd packaging to ensure the product comes within his license remit.

With regards to the driver CPC training.  I would like to point out to Alec that I am currently training my own in house trainer, who will from the September start date, be providing on the job training to each and every driver in excess of the laws requirement of 7 hours per year.  in addition to taht will continue with the RHA icon training programme taken up some 3 years ago.  So I take exception to his comment that I operate my company &quot;on the fringes of legality&quot;.  I abide by the laws controlling every aspect of operating  a HGV including ADR.  My traffic staff are ADR trained despite the fact is is not a legal requirement and that we only carry printing ink and arable fertiliser.  They are also time served drivers and take exception to his calling them &quot;under trained cretins&quot;.  Nobody is taking away a drivers need to ensure his vehicle is safely loaded, infact i can only wish some would pay more attention to this requirement.

I can assure Alec that my drivers are not expected to exceed the legal limits of anything, and I would be very pleased to show him my drivers tachograph records, both analogue and digital, infringement reports signed off by the driver concerned,DGSA annual reports, maintenance records, infact anything he would care to inspect.  The only problem is that I don&#039;t think he would get past the &quot;under trained cretins&quot; in the traffic office in one peice.

Alec&#039;s comments regarding drivers being asked to colect ADR goods they are not licence to handle, reflect the corners that some operators both large and small are prepared to cut.  Please do not count me amongst them without first qualifying your asumptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having just read Alec&#8217;s comments from the 23rd September, I would like to respond.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know who Alec is or how long he has worked in the transport industry, and therefore cannot comment if I would consider him suitable for a position in my company or not.  But what I do have knowledge of are HGV drivers.  After 35 years I certainly know a good one from a bad one and what can and cannot be expected of them.<br />
Some of the best drivers I have had could bearly read or write, and have one now that finds his way around by comparing the shape of the words of a destination to the road signs.  He is a very productive driver and quite happy to be working for someone who can live with and help him with his problem.</p>
<p>But the content of a ADR course is beyond him.  Even the ones who can pass with no problem do not have a retentive memory.  Its not usual for these men to leave a collection point with ADR product on board and yet fail to ensure they have a Trem Card.</p>
<p>I stand by what I say.  In the vast majority of cases the decision of what a haulier is going to carry on his truck is made by the traffic management.  Providng the product is covered by the driver&#8217;s ADR license then that is not a problem.  The vehicle or trailer is often loaded in the driver&#8217;s absence, and a driver turning in at 4am in the morning is highly unlikely to open up his vehicle to see what is stacked next to what.</p>
<p>These are all decision made by trained traffic management and therefore it is these people would really need the intensive training to ensure the load is safe both in terms of the mixing of volatile chemicals, and the packaging limits.</p>
<p>The driver should have concentrated training on what to do in an emergency, and how to interpret ADR labels amd packaging to ensure the product comes within his license remit.</p>
<p>With regards to the driver CPC training.  I would like to point out to Alec that I am currently training my own in house trainer, who will from the September start date, be providing on the job training to each and every driver in excess of the laws requirement of 7 hours per year.  in addition to taht will continue with the RHA icon training programme taken up some 3 years ago.  So I take exception to his comment that I operate my company &#8220;on the fringes of legality&#8221;.  I abide by the laws controlling every aspect of operating  a HGV including ADR.  My traffic staff are ADR trained despite the fact is is not a legal requirement and that we only carry printing ink and arable fertiliser.  They are also time served drivers and take exception to his calling them &#8220;under trained cretins&#8221;.  Nobody is taking away a drivers need to ensure his vehicle is safely loaded, infact i can only wish some would pay more attention to this requirement.</p>
<p>I can assure Alec that my drivers are not expected to exceed the legal limits of anything, and I would be very pleased to show him my drivers tachograph records, both analogue and digital, infringement reports signed off by the driver concerned,DGSA annual reports, maintenance records, infact anything he would care to inspect.  The only problem is that I don&#8217;t think he would get past the &#8220;under trained cretins&#8221; in the traffic office in one peice.</p>
<p>Alec&#8217;s comments regarding drivers being asked to colect ADR goods they are not licence to handle, reflect the corners that some operators both large and small are prepared to cut.  Please do not count me amongst them without first qualifying your asumptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

